Compared to what?

Every argument about risk is secretly an argument about the alternative.

'Nuclear is dangerous' compared to what? 'That's expensive' compared to what? Nothing is good or bad against zero — it's good or bad against the thing you'd do instead. Put the two next to each other and the argument usually settles itself.

Instead of

It's just too risky.

Try

Too risky compared to coal? Because that's the actual alternative, and the numbers aren't close.

Try it today

Next time you hear 'too expensive' or 'too risky', ask 'compared to what?'

The science

Kahneman's anchoring and the base-rate neglect literature (Thinking, Fast and Slow, 2011): judgements of risk are made relative to a reference point, so choose the reference.

Where you'd actually use it

Next lesson

All 30 lessons →

Knowing it and doing it are different skills.

FlowTalk drops you into the argument where "compared to what?" is the thing that saves you — and judges what you actually said.

Make your case — free