πŸ’Ό Work & MeetingsHardπŸ—£οΈ Out loud

How to defend your timeline when someone says you're padding it

The situation

A senior colleague has just accused you, in front of the client, of inflating your timeline. You haven't β€” the estimate is real. You need to hold the number without making the client nervous or your colleague an enemy. What do you say?

They open with: β€œHonestly, I think you're padding it. My team could turn this round in a week.”

Why it's hard: You're being called dishonest in front of the client, and arguing back risks making the client nervous while making an enemy of your accuser.

Two things you could say

  • β€œHappy to walk through it β€” the estimate's three big pieces: [X, Y, Z]. Which one do you think we can safely cut? Because I'd love to be faster.”

    Breaking the number into its parts and inviting them to cut one makes the estimate look honest and hands the risk to whoever wants it shorter.

  • β€œI hear that it looks long. It's built for the version that doesn't come back to bite us in month two β€” but if the appetite is to move faster and accept more risk, that's a real conversation.”

    Naming the trade-off β€” speed versus risk β€” reframes "padding" as a deliberate choice, so you're defending a judgement call rather than defending your integrity.

What to avoid

"I don't pad my estimates, thanks." β€” it defends your honour instead of your number, leaves the client with a nagging doubt, and turns a technical disagreement into a personal one you can't win in the room.

The principle

Never argue the accusation β€” argue the work. Break the estimate into its three biggest pieces out loud and invite them to name which one to cut. Specificity is what makes a number look honest.

The skill underneath it

More work & meetings moments

All 54 situations β†’

You'll know what to say. Saying it is the part that needs practice.

In FlowTalk this one talks back β€” you make your case, the other side answers, and a coach reads what you actually said.

Try this one free